This policy update is the work of USAID’s Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning’s Office of Learning, Evaluation and Research (PPL/LER). This update had been made to ensure consistency with revisions to USAID’s Automated Directives System (ADS) Chapter 201 Program Cycle Operational Policy,...
this new innovative methodology is being employed to evaluate program interventions, using case examples from USAID, the German Development Bank, and the World Bank.
Quantitative Tools and Methods
Qualitative Methods and Approaches
Comparing Sampling Strategies
Draft recommendations on how to measure organizational capacity development programming
This webinar featured PPL, regional, and technical bureau representatives who have participated and led evaluation statement of work (SOW) peer reviews. They discussed good practices in conducting peer reviews and how to get the most out of the process, resulting in a strong SOW with buy-in from key stakeholders.
Note on Page Content: The content on this and associated pages continues to be informative. However, it was created prior to the most recent ADS revision and references to policy may be outdated. As such, users should verify all references to the ADS.Are you getting the evaluation quality you expect from your contracted...
USAID's Evaluation Interest Group Resources
This template is an optional tool to help improve consistency across evaluation reports.This content is currently under revision to align with the recently updated ADS 201. For guidance and support associated with revisions to ADS 201, please see the Program Cycle overview page.